שפת אמת

Moshe's Compassion for Israel

Vaeira · תרל"ו (1875) · Essay 2
במדרש בכל עצב יהי' מותר ודבר שפתים אך למחסור.

“In the Midrash: ‘In all sadness there will be gain, but the word of the lips brings only to lack.’”

The Sefat Emet begins by citing the Midrash, which contrasts productive struggle with speech that diminishes the result.

ע"י שאמר משה כו' שיתף עמו אהרן כו'.

“Because Moses spoke as he did, Aaron was joined with him.”

The Midrash teaches that Moses’ hesitation caused the mission to be shared with Aaron.

נראה מדברי המדרש כי הי' זה חסרון.

“It appears from the Midrash that this was a deficiency.”

The shared mission is interpreted as indicating a spiritual shortfall.

כי אם הי' מרע"ה עצמו הגואל. הי' עצהיו"ט.

“For if Moses himself had been the sole redeemer, it would have been the ideal counsel.”

Moses alone could have brought a higher form of redemption.

וז"ש עתה תראה כו' ולא במלחמת ל"א מלכים.

“And this is the meaning of ‘Now you will see…’ but not in the war of the thirty‑one kings.”

“Now you will see” is read as limiting Moses’ role to the Egyptian redemption, not the conquest of the land.

פי' ע"י שמיאן.

“This means: because he refused.”

Moses’ reluctance is presented as the root cause.

והי' השליחות בצירוף אהרן.

“And the mission became with the inclusion of Aaron.”

The partnership is a direct consequence of the refusal.

לכן לא הביאם מרע"ה לא"י.

“Therefore Moses did not bring them to the Land of Israel.”

The Sefat Emet links the shared mission to Moses’ later inability to complete the journey.

כי אם הי' נעשה כרצונו ית'. הי' הגאולה באופן גבוה אשר הי' מרע"ה מכניסם לארץ והי' תיקון הכולל.

“For had it been done according to His will, the redemption would have been on a higher level, with Moses bringing them into the land, completing the universal repair.”

A fully elevated redemption would have unified Exodus and entry into the land under Moses.

כי עתה תראה אינו בדרך קנס. רק שכן מוכרח להיות.

“For ‘Now you will see’ is not a punishment, but the necessary result.”

Moses’ limitation is framed not as penalty but as natural consequence.

וז"ש בכל עצב יהי' מותר.

“And this is the meaning of: ‘In all sadness there will be gain.’”

The hardship carries an inner profit when borne fully.

שאאם היו יכולין לקבל כל הדחקות אז. ולא היו אומרים ירא ה' כו'.

“For if they could have accepted all the hardship then, and not said ‘May the Lord see…’”

The generation’s outcry limited the level of redemption.

וכן מרע"ה למה הרעותה. הי' מתוקן הכל.

“And likewise, had Moses not said ‘Why have You harmed…,’ everything would have been rectified.”

Moses’ empathic protest also constricted the process.

אך מרע"ה לא הי' יכול לסבול צער ישראל ונחשב זה לו לשבח.

“But Moses could not bear Israel’s suffering, and this is considered praise for him.”

His inability came from deep compassion, not deficiency.

משל החולה שגוברים עליו היסורין מהרפואות.

“Like a sick person whose suffering from the treatments overwhelms him.”

The Sefat Emet introduces a parable.

אשר מבקש להניח הכל בעבור היסורין.

“He begs to stop everything because of the pain.”

The patient cannot tolerate what is meant for healing.

אך הרופא יודע ומבין כי היסורין לטובת החולה לכן אינו משגיח עליו.

“But the doctor knows the suffering is for the patient’s good, and does not heed him.”

The doctor sees the larger purpose.

אבל מרע"ה הרגיש בצערן של ישראל ממש כמו הם עצמם.

“But Moses felt Israel’s pain exactly as they themselves did.”

Moses differs from the doctor; he shares the pain.

ולכן אף שידע כי לטובת ישראל הוא לא הי' יכול לסבול בשום אופן בצערן של ישראל ולכן עשה השי"ת רצונו והי' הגאולה בצירוף מדה"ר.

“Therefore, even knowing it was for Israel’s good, he could not bear their suffering in any way, and so God fulfilled his desire, and the redemption came together with the attribute of mercy.”

God adjusts the redemption’s mode to align with Moses’ compassion.

ועמ"ש בסמוך:

“And see what is written nearby.”

The Sefat Emet refers the reader to the continuation.

Summary: The Sefat Emet reads Moses’ reluctance and his deep empathy for Israel as both limiting and elevating the redemption. Had Moses alone led, the redemption would have reached a higher wholeness, including entry into the land, but his compassion reshaped the process into one requiring Aaron and emphasizing divine mercy.