The pierced ear and constant readiness to serve Hashem
eved ivri · na'aseh v'nishma · ol malchus Shomayim · geulah · mitzvos
בפסוק אהבתי את אדוני כו' אשתי כו' בני לא אצא חפשי כו' ורצע כו' את אזנו ואמרו חז"ל אוזן ששמעה לי בנ"י עבדים כו'.
On the verse, "I love my master … my wife … my children, I will not go out free …" and "he shall pierce … his ear" (Shemos 21:5-6), and Chazal said: "The ear that heard [at Sinai] 'For unto Me are Bnei Yisrael servants' [and yet this one acquired a master for himself, let it be pierced]" (Kiddushin 22b).
The eved ivri (Hebrew servant) who refuses to go free has his ear pierced, because that ear heard at Har Sinai that Bnei Yisrael are servants of Hashem alone, yet he chose ongoing servitude to a human master.
וקשה כיון דחטא במעשה ולא בשמיעה. למה יפגימו האוזן.
And it is difficult: since he sinned through an action and not through hearing, why should they blemish the ear?
The Sefas Emes raises the question: the servant's failing was in his choice to remain a slave (an action), not in his ear — so why punish specifically the ear?
ומו"ז ז"ל תי' בזה לפי שלא קיים מה ששמע מוטב שלא לשמוע. לכן עושין פגם באזנו.
And my grandfather, of blessed memory, answered: since he did not fulfill what he heard, it would have been better not to have heard — therefore they make a blemish in his ear.
His grandfather explained that hearing carries an obligation; one who fails to act on what he heard at Sinai has, in a sense, wasted that hearing, so the ear is marked.
וי"ל עוד בזה עפ"י דברי הזוהר פ' בהר בפסוק לחפשי חנם. חנם מן המצות ע"ש הדברים באורך.
And one may say further on this, based on the words of the Zohar, Parshas Behar, on the verse "to freedom, for nothing (chinam)" — "free of charge" meaning free from the mitzvos; see the matter there at length.
The Sefas Emes adds a further explanation drawn from the Zohar, which reads "going out free for nothing" as becoming free of the obligation of mitzvos — and treats that "freedom" as a loss rather than a gain.
והענין הוא דבני ישראל אמרו אשר דיבר ה' נעשה ונשמע.
And the matter is this: Bnei Yisrael said, "All that Hashem has spoken, we will do and we will hear (na'aseh v'nishma)" (Shemos 24:7).
At Sinai, Bnei Yisrael famously committed to "doing" and "hearing," placing na'aseh before nishma.
פי' שאינם רוצין להפטר מן המצוה רק מוכנים לעולם לשמוע ולעשות רצונו ית"ש שעל זה נבראו וכל מגמתם לשמוע ולעשות.
That is, they do not wish to be discharged from the mitzvah, but are forever ready to hear and to do His will, may He be blessed — for which they were created, and their entire aspiration is to hear and to do.
The true desire of Bnei Yisrael is never to be "done" with mitzvos but to remain perpetually poised to hear and carry out Hashem's will, since that is the very purpose of their existence.
ואלו היו אומרים נעשה בלבד הי' נראה שמקיימים המצוה בלבד להיות יוצא ידי חובתו כדין.
And had they said "we will do" alone, it would have appeared that they merely fulfill the mitzvah in order to discharge their obligation as the law requires.
Had they committed only to "doing," it would suggest a minimalist attitude — performing mitzvos just to satisfy the strict requirement and be done.
אבל מדת החסיד לפנים משורת הדין שאין די לו לצאת ידי חובתו.
But the quality of the chassid is "beyond the letter of the law" (lifnim mishuras hadin), for it is not enough for him merely to discharge his obligation.
A truly devoted person is never satisfied with the bare minimum; he seeks to go beyond what is strictly demanded.
רק שמתלהב בכל עת לקיום מצות הבורא ית"ש.
Rather, he is aflame at every moment to fulfill the mitzvos of the Creator, may He be blessed.
The chassid burns continually with eagerness to perform Hashem's commandments, always wanting more, not less.
וזה בחי' עול מלכות שמים וכ' שם בזוה"ק כההוא תורא דיהבין עלוי עול להיות מוכן לעשות רצון בעליו זה עיקר יותר מקיום המצוה.
And this is the aspect of "the yoke of the Kingdom of Heaven (ol malchus Shomayim)," and it is written there in the Zohar HaKadosh: like that ox upon which one places a yoke, to be ready to do its owner's will — this is more essential than the [mere] fulfillment of the mitzvah.
Accepting the "yoke" of Heaven means standing ready, like a yoked ox, to do the Master's will at any moment; this readiness and submission is even more fundamental than any single act of mitzvah performance.
ולכן זה העבד הגם שיוכל להיות כי טוב לו אצל רבו ויכול לקיים המצות כפי מה שהוא.
And therefore this servant — even though it may be that he is well off with his master and can still keep the mitzvos as he is —
The Hebrew servant who stays on may well be comfortable and still able to observe mitzvos in his servile state.
כי אין הקב"ה בא בטרוניא עם בריותיו וכמו כן בגלות שאין יכולין לקיים כל המצות כראוי.
For the Kadosh Baruch Hu does not come with unfair demands upon His creatures — and similarly in galus, when we cannot fulfill all the mitzvos properly.
Hashem never asks the impossible; just as the servant is judged by his circumstances, so in exile we are not held accountable for mitzvos we genuinely cannot perform.
מ"מ לפי מצב האדם יוכל להיות שבגלות מקיימים המוטל עלינו יותר משהי' בזמן המקדש שהרי מצינו חטאים גדולים בזמן המקדש.
Nevertheless, according to a person's situation, it may be that in galus we fulfill what is incumbent upon us more than in the time of the Mikdash — for we find great sins in the time of the Mikdash.
Measured against our limited circumstances, our service in exile may actually exceed that of the Temple era, when, despite greater opportunity, serious sins still occurred.
כי כפום גמלא שיחנא והקב"ה מדקדק עם הקרובים אליו כחוט השערה.
For "according to the camel is the load" (Sotah 13b), and the Kadosh Baruch Hu is exacting with those close to Him to a hairsbreadth (Yevamos 121b).
Greater capacity brings greater responsibility; Hashem holds those nearest to Him to an exceedingly precise standard, so more was demanded in the time of the Mikdash.
ואותן שאמרו חדל ממנו ונעבדה את מצרים כו' וכמו כן זכרנו את הדגה כו' לא היו רשעים גמורים.
And those who said, "Leave us alone, that we may serve Egypt …" (Shemos 14:12), and likewise "we remember the fish …" (Bamidbar 11:5) — they were not complete resha'im (wicked ones).
Even the Israelites in the wilderness who voiced complaints about returning to Egypt or longing for its food were not truly wicked at heart.
אלא שראו שזה הדרך נקל לפניהם לקיים המוטל עליהם.
Rather, they saw that this path was easier for them to fulfill what was incumbent upon them.
Their error was preferring an easier route to serving Hashem — much like the servant who chooses to remain a slave because it is more comfortable.
אבל בנ"י נבראו להיות מוכנים רק לשמוע דבר ה' וצריכין לצפות לגאולה כדי להיות מוכן לקיים מצותיו בכל עת.
But Bnei Yisrael were created to be ready only to hear the word of Hashem, and they must yearn for the geulah in order to be ready to fulfill His mitzvos at all times.
The essence of a Jew is to remain ever-poised to hear and obey Hashem; this is why we must long for the geulah — not for comfort, but so that we can serve Hashem fully and constantly.
אפילו שנהי' בסכנה ביותר כל הקרב אל משכן ה' ע"ז הקדמנו נעשה לנשמע.
Even if we will be in the greatest danger — "anyone who draws near to the Mishkan of Hashem [dies]" (cf. Bamidbar 17:28) — for this we placed "na'aseh" before "nishma."
Our readiness to serve must be so total that we accept it even at mortal risk; this very willingness, regardless of danger, is what "na'aseh" before "nishma" expresses.
לכן האומר אהבתי כו' לא אצא חפשי פוגם בשמיעה כנ"ל.
Therefore one who says, "I love [my master] … I will not go out free," blemishes the [faculty of] hearing, as above.
By choosing to stay a servant and step out of the posture of perpetual readiness to hear Hashem's word, he damages the very faculty of nishma — hence the ear is pierced.
[ונוכל לרמז אהבתי את אדוני פי' כמ"ש ואהבת את ה' אלקיך בכל לבבך כו' ובכל מאודך.
[And we may hint: "I love my master (adoni)" — its meaning is as it is written, "And you shall love Hashem your God with all your heart … and with all your might (me'odecha)" (Devarim 6:5).
The Sefas Emes offers a homiletic reading: "I love my master" can be heard as a Jew declaring his love for Hashem with all his heart and all his resources.
וז"ש אהבתי את ה' גם באמצעיות אדוני ואשתי השפחה לא אצא חפשי שמוצא עצמו עובד ה' בימי העבדות בנקל יותר.
And this is the meaning: "I love Hashem" — even by means of "my master and my wife the maidservant, I will not go out free" — for he finds himself serving Hashem more easily during the days of servitude.
In this reading, the servant claims he can love and serve Hashem even through his bondage, finding it easier to serve Hashem within the framework of slavery.
אעפ"כ אין זה מדת בני ישראל רק לשמוע תמיד דבר ה'].
Even so, this is not the proper measure of Bnei Yisrael — rather, [their measure is] always to hear the word of Hashem.]
Nonetheless, even if servitude makes service easier, that is not the ideal for a Jew; the ideal is to remain perpetually free and ready to hear and obey Hashem directly.
לכן כתיב ורצע את אזנו:
Therefore it is written, "and he shall pierce his ear."
Because he abandoned the posture of constant readiness to hear Hashem's word, the ear that heard at Sinai is pierced as the fitting consequence.
Summary: The eved ivri's ear is pierced not for a sin of hearing but because, by choosing to remain a servant, he forsook the Jewish ideal of na'aseh v'nishma — the constant readiness to hear and do Hashem's will, the "yoke of Heaven" that matters even more than any single mitzvah. A Jew's essence is to stay forever poised to serve, which is why we yearn for the geulah; service measured by circumstance may even surpass that of the Mikdash era, but choosing the easier path of servitude over perpetual readiness blemishes the faculty of "nishma," and so the ear is pierced.
Related Teachings
- Revealing Torah Through DeedsShemot · תרס"ב · Essay 2
- Purpose of RedemptionPesach · תרנ"ט · Essay 1
- Redeeming the Torah's captive lightYitro · תרנ"ה · Essay 2
- Shabbos HaGadol: inner root of redemptionShabbat HaGadol · תרנ"א · Essay 1
- Three stages of the soul's redemptionShabbat HaGadol · תרמ"ו · Essay 3
- Spiritual Renewal of ExodusPesach · תרמ"ה · Essay 2